Whiten, A., van de Waal, E. 2018. The pervasive role of social learning in primate lifetimedevelopment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 72: 80.
Whiten, A., van Schaik, C. P. 2007. The evolution of animal ‘cultures’ and social intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 362: 603–620.
Whiteside, M. A., Bess, M. M., Frasnelli, E., Beardsworth, C. E., Langley, E. J. G., van Horik, J. O., Madden, J. R. 2020. No evidence that footedness in pheasants influences cognitive performance in tasks assessing colour discrimination and spatial ability. Learn Behav 48: 84–95.
Whitfield, M., Köhler, A., Nicolson, S. W. 2014. Sunbirds increase foraging success by using color as a cue for nectar quality. Behavioral Ecology 25: 328–334.
Whitham, J. C., Gerald, M. S., Maestripieri, D. 2007. Intended receivers and functional significance of grunt and girney vocalizations in free-ranging female rhesus macaques. Ethology 113: 862–874.
Whitham, J. C., Maestripieri, D. 2003. Primate rituals: The function of greetings between male guinea baboons. Ethology 109: 847–859.
Whitham, W., Schapiro, S. J., Troscianko, J., Yorzinski, J. L. 2022. Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) gaze is conspicuous at ecologically-relevant distances. Scientific Reports 12: 9249.
Whitham, W., Schapiro, S. J., Troscianko, J., Yorzinski, J. L. 2022. The gaze of a social monkey is perceptible to conspecifics and predators but not prey. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 289: 20220194.
Whiting, M. J., While, G. M. 2026. Tiliquin lizards as a model vertebrate system for understanding the emergence of societies. Animal Behaviour 231: 123404.
Whitney, H. M., Kolle, M., Andrew, P., Chittka, L., Steiner, U., Glover, B. J. 2009. Response to comment on “Floral iridescence, produced by diffractive optics, acts as a cue for animal pollinators”. Science 325: 1072.
Whitney, H. M., Kolle, M., Andrew, P., Chittka, L., Steiner, U., Glover, B. J. 2009. Floral iridescence, produced by diffractive optics, acts as a cue for animal pollinators. Science 323: 130–133.
Whitt, E., Douglas, M., Osthaus, B., Hocking, I. 2009. Domestic cats (Felis catus) do not show causal understanding in a string-pulling task. Animal Cognition 12: 739–743.
Whittaker, B. A. 2025. Variation in animal architecture: Genes, environment, and culture. Learn Behav 53: 225–226.
Whittaker, D. J., Reichard, D. G., Drouilly, M., Battle, K., Ziegenfus, C. 2015. Avian olfactory displays: a hypothesis for the function of bill-wiping in a social context. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 69: 159–167.
Wibbelt, G., Moore, M. S., Schountz, T., Voigt, C. C. 2010. Emerging diseases in Chiroptera: why bats?. Biology Letters 6: 438–440.
Wice, E. W., Saltz, J. B. 2023. Indirect genetic effects for social network structure in Drosophila melanogaster. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 378: 20220075.
Wich, S. A., de Vries, H. 2005. Male monkeys remember which group members have given alarm calls. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273: 735–740.
Wich, S. A., Koski, S., de Vries, H., van Schaik, C. P. 2003. Individual and contextual variation in Thomas Langur male loud calls. Ethology 109: 1–13.
Wich, S. A., Nunn, C. L. 2002. Do male "long-distance calls" function in mate defense? A comparative study of long-distance calls in primates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 52: 474–484.
Wickler, W. 2013. Understanding mimicry – with special reference to vocal mimicry. Ethology 119: 259–269.

<<First    < Previous    690 691 692 693 694 695 696     Next >    Last >>