![]() | Hillemann, F., Cole, E. F., Sheldon, B. C., Farine, D. R. 2020. Information use in foraging flocks of songbirds: no evidence for social transmission of patch quality. Animal Behaviour 165: 35–41. |
![]() | Hilliard, M. A., Bargmann, C. I., Bazzicalupo, P. 2002. C. elegans responds to chemical repellents by integrating sensory inputs from the head and the tail. Current Biology 12: 730–734. |
![]() | Hills, A., Webster, M. M. 2022. Sampling biases and reproducibility: experimental design decisions affect behavioural responses in hermit crabs. Animal Behaviour 194: 101–110. |
![]() | Hinde, R. A. 2015. Reflections over 50 Years. Advances in the study of behavior Volume 47: 1–3. |
![]() | Hintze, S., Heigl, H., Winckler, C. 2024. Towards a task to assess boredom-like states in pigs: stimulus validation as a basis. PLoS One 19: e0311843. |
![]() | Hinz, C., Kobbenbring, S., Kress, S., Sigman, L., Müller, A., Gerlach, G. 2013. Kin recognition in zebrafish, Danio rerio, is based on imprinting on olfactory and visual stimuli. Animal Behaviour 85: 925–930. |
![]() | Hiramatsu, C., Melin, A. D., Allen, W. L., Dubuc, C., Higham, J. P. 2017. Experimental evidence that primate trichromacy is well suited for detecting primate social colour signals. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284: 2453. |
![]() | Hirata, M., Arimoto, C., Hattori, N., Anzai, H. 2019. Can cattle visually discriminate between green and dead forages at a short distance while moving in the field?. Animal Cognition 22: 707–718. |
![]() | Hirata, M., Kusatake, N. 2020. How cattle discriminate between green and dead forages accessible by head and neck movements by means of senses: reliance on vision varies with the distance to the forages. Animal Cognition 23: 405–414. |
![]() | Hirata, M., Kusatake, N. 2021. Relative importance of senses in forage discrimination by cattle depends on the sensory contrast between the discrimination targets: a preliminary study. Animal Cognition 24: 99–106. |
![]() | Hirata, S. 2018. Fake snakes uncover chimpanzees’ mind-reading ability. Learn Behav 46: 225–226. |
![]() | Hirata, S., Celli, M. L. 2003. Role of mothers in the acquisition of tool-use behaviours by captive infant chimpanzees. Animal Cognition 6: 235–244. |
![]() | Hirata, S., Fuwa, K., Myowa, M. 2017. Chimpanzees recognize their own delayed self-image. Royal Society Open Science 4: 170370. |
![]() | Hirata, S., Fuwa, K., Sugama, K., Kusunoki, K., Fujita, S. 2010. Facial perception of conspecifics: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) preferentially attend to proper orientation and open eyes. Animal Cognition 13: 679–688. |
![]() | Hirata, S., Matsuzawa, T. 2001. Tactics to obtain a hidden food item in chimpanzee pairs (Pan troglodytes). Animal Cognition 4: 285–295. |
![]() | Hirata, S., Morimura, N., Houki, C. 2009. How to crack nuts: acquisition process in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) observing a model. Animal Cognition 12: 87–101. |
![]() | Hirel, M., Marziliano, M., Meunier, H., Rakoczy, H., Fischer, J., Keupp, S. 2026. Social evaluation of skilfulness in Tonkean macaques (Macaca tonkeana) and brown capuchins (Sapajus apella). Animal Cognition 29: 15. |
![]() | Hirel, M., Meunier, H., Rakoczy, H., Fischer, J., Keupp, S. 2025. Tonkean macaques do not prefer the helper or the hinderer in the hill paradigm. Royal Society Open Science 12: 250488. |
![]() | Hironaka, M., Filippi, L., Nomakuchi, S., Horiguchi, H., Hariyama, T. 2007. Hierarchical use of chemical marking and path integration in the homing trip of a subsocial shield bug. Animal Behaviour 73: 739–745. |
![]() | Hirsch, B. T. 2002. Social monitoring and vigilance behavior in brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 52: 458–464. |
<<First < Previous 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 Next > Last >>





