 | Huskisson, S. M., Ross, S. R., Hopper, L. M. 2021. Do zoo visitors induce attentional bias effects in primates completing cognitive tasks?. Animal Cognition 24: 645–653. |
| Hutcheon, J. M., Kirsch, J. A. W., Garland Jr, T. 2002. A comparative analysis of brain size in relation to foraging ecology and phylogeny in the chiroptera. Brain Behavior and Evolution 60: 165–180. |
 | Hutchins, M., Saltz, J. 2025. Eavesdropping and audience effect in fighting fruit flies reveal feedback between social information use and production. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 79: 18. |
 | Hvorecny, L. M., Grudowski, J. L., Blakeslee, C. J., Simmons, T. L., Roy, P. R., Brooks, J. A., Hanner, R. M., Beigel, M. E., Karson, M. A., Nichols, R. H. 2007. Octopuses (Octopus bimaculoides) and cuttlefishes (Sepia pharaonis, S. officinalis) can conditionally discriminate. Animal Cognition 10: 449–459. |
 | Iacopini, I., Foote, J. R., Fefferman, N. H., Derryberry, E. P., Silk, M. J. 2024. Not your private tête-à-tête: leveraging the power of higher-order networks to study animal communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 379: 20230190. |
 | Ibáñez de Aldecoa, P., Auersperg, A. M. I., Griffin, A. S., Tebbich, S. 2023. Ratcheting up tool innovation in Goffin's cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana): The effect of contextually diverse prior experience. Ethology 129: 133–145. |
| Ibáñez de Aldecoa, P., Tebbich, S., Griffin, A. S. 2024. Persistence associated with extractive foraging explains variation in innovation in Darwin’s finches. Behavioral Ecology 35: arad090. |
| Ibanez, A. 2022. The mind's golden cage and cognition in the wild. Trends Cogn Sci 26: 1031–1034. |
 | Ibáñez, A., López, P., Martín, J. 2012. Discrimination of conspecifics’ chemicals may allow Spanish terrapins to find better partners and avoid competitors. Animal Behaviour 83: 1107–1113. |
| Ibbotson, M. R. 2001. Evidence for velocity–tuned motion-sensitive descending neurons in the honeybee. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 268: 2195–2201. |
| Ibbotson, M. R. 2017. Visual neuroscience: Unique neural system for flight stabilization in hummingbirds. Current Biology 27: R58–R61. |
| Idsardi, W. J. 2020. Some cautions regarding the phonological continuity hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 375: 20190050. |
| Igic, B., Magrath, R. D. 2013. Fidelity of vocal mimicry: identification and accuracy of mimicry of heterospecific alarm calls by the brown thornbill. Animal Behaviour 85: 593–603. |
| Igic, B., Magrath, R. D. 2014. A songbird mimics different heterospecific alarm calls in response to different types of threat. Behavioral Ecology 25: 538–548. |
| Igic, B., McLachlan, J., Lehtinen, I., Magrath, R. D. 2015. Crying wolf to a predator: deceptive vocal mimicry by a bird protecting young. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 282: 20150798. |
| Igic, B., Ratnayake, C. P., Radford, A. N., Magrath, R. D. 2019. Eavesdropping magpies respond to the number of heterospecifics giving alarm calls but not the number of species calling. Animal Behaviour 148: 133–143. |
| Iglesias, T. L., McElreath, R., Patricelli, G. L. 2012. Western scrub-jay funerals: cacophonous aggregations in response to dead conspecifics. Animal Behaviour 84: 1103–1111. |
| Ihalainen, E., Lindström, L., Mappes, J., Puolakkainen, S. 2008. Butterfly effects in mimicry? Combining signal and taste can twist the relationship of Müllerian co-mimics. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62: 1267–1276. |
| Ihalainen, E., Lindström, L., Mappes, J., Puolakkainen, S. 2008. Can experienced birds select for Müllerian mimicry?. Behavioral Ecology 19: 362–368. |
| Iki, S., Hasegawa, T. 2020. Face-to-face opening phase in Japanese macaques’ social play enhances and sustains participants’ engagement in subsequent play interaction. Animal Cognition 23: 149–158. |
<<First < Previous 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 Next > Last >>